May 02
2007
Worth a vote after all?
» Posted on May 2, 2007 09:22 AM » Category: UK politics

Peter Briffa speaks for me:

"Tories are promising tax and spending cuts up and down the country if they win. Rightwing ideologues took over Hammersmith and Fulham a year ago from a well-run Labour group, cutting council tax by 3p, cutting £14.4m from children's services, housing, care for the frail and charity grants and closing a mental health centre. Tory Walsall is cutting vulnerable children's services, so is Swindon, Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire. The list of cuts elsewhere is long, but for those with short memories, that's what Conservatives usually do".

Interesting. Maybe they're worth voting for after all.


MessageSpace
Comments

My goodness, yes! Let's have no more of those services for vulnerable children.

Stated by: Stuarta on May 2, 2007 1:48 PM

'No more care for the frail' is another powerful vote winner.

Stated by: Ted on May 2, 2007 3:14 PM

What services? What care? You mean, let's cut back on the endless bureaucracy, don't you, and more jobs in the Council that will discuss care and services.

Stated by: Helen on May 2, 2007 4:10 PM

Briffa and Pollard are purporting to take Toynbee at her word. She says, among other things, that "Tory Walsall is cutting vulnerable children's services". They see this policy, as summarised by Toynbee, as reason to vote Conservative. Nobody mentioned bureaucracy.

Stated by: Stuarta on May 2, 2007 5:28 PM

"Rightwing ideologues took over Hammersmith and Fulham a year ago"

Took over? What did they do? Stage a coup and install a military junta? I think what Polly Pot means is that 'the Conservative party was elected'.

"a well-run Labour group"

So well-run that the voters chucked them out, apparently, in favour of right-wing 'ideologues'

Democracy, eh Polly?

Stated by: Corsair on May 2, 2007 6:04 PM
Post a comment

    


    •