| March | 23 |
| 2007 |
I was about to post on the political stupidity of Gordon Brown's budget; Daniel Finkelstein has beaten me to it. Daniel observes three mistakes, but for me by far the biggest is 'The Message Mistake':
Gordon Brown wants to be seen as upright, substantial, rigorous and honest, a contrast to Cameron's spin. The public do not believe politicians and are, rightly, suspicious of Budget announcements.So what do you do? You present your Budget with painful honesty, showing clearly where the money comes from and where it goes to. Under no circumstances do you leave yourself open to the charge of secretive stealthiness. But Brown seemed more interested in achieving "Gord Bless Him" headlines than in winning political support. This is a political error made by people who mistake Westminster opinion for everyone else's.
Almost every non-political person I've spoken to since Wednesday has said the same thing: that Brown bloke wants us to think he's different, but the Busget shows he's the same as the rest of them. Does he think we're all idiots and will fall for any old con-trick?
I've written repeatedly that Brown is Labour's biggest vote loser, and almost unelectable. The Budget reinforces my view. I've never bought into the idea that he is some kind of political strategic genius. he isn't. He's a rather dull machine politician. Labour's only got one of political genius, and the party's - and Brown's - reaction to having him was to frustrate him at every turn and then boot him out. And they call the Conservatives the stupid party!

MessageSpace
"I've never bought into the idea that he is some kind of political strategic genius. he isn't."
Quite so! Before Blair trumped him with Iraq, Brown had the monopoly on policy/presentational blunders -
1. Triple counting of "investment" in schools'n'hospitals.
2. Raising fuel duty at a time of rising world oil prices - precipitating the farmer's revolt.
3. Applying an RPI of then less than 2% to produce a pension/benefit rise of 70p pw. He should have seen the revolt coming. If instead he had switched to using his then inflation measure, RPIX, of 2.5% he might have avoided what became an enormous cost to placate the oldies.
There's not a lot that can be added to this, Stephen. Er ... you're right.
Brown IS a super-genius. As compared to his fellow New Lab shining lights, that is.

