| February | 23 |
| 2007 |
Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Ed-ward Lawrence - better known as "Lawrence of Arabia" - and renowned as a champion of Arab independence, actually had "a sort of contempt for the Arabs" and was an advocate of Jewish statehood from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, according to acclaimed British historian Sir Martin Gilbert.Lawrence believed that only with a sovereign Jewish entity in the area would the Arabs "ever make anything of themselves," according to Gilbert.
T.E. Lawrence, immortalized on film by Peter O'Toole, fought with Arab irregulars against the Ottoman Empire in World War I, wore Arabian clothes and adopted many Arab customs. He is widely perceived, Gilbert told The Jerusalem Post this week, as "the great Arabist, right? The man who supported the Arabs, and who pushed for Arab nationhood in the 1920s. He's always pictured wearing Arab robes."
The "astonishing" truth, however, Gilbert went on, is that Lawrence was "a serious Zionist. He believed that the only hope for the Arabs of Palestine and the rest of the region was Jewish statehood - that if the Jews had a state here, they would provide the modernity, the 'leaven,' as he put it, with which to enable the Arabs to move into the 20th century."
Gilbert, who said he had written about this issue in his forthcoming book, Churchill and the Jews, went so far as to say that Lawrence "had a sort of contempt for the Arabs, actually."
"He felt that only with a Jewish presence and state would the Arabs ever make anything of themselves. And, by a Jewish state, he meant a Jewish state from the Mediterranean shore to the River Jordan," said Gilbert, adding his own comment that this "will never come to pass."
Blimey.

MessageSpace
That doesn't mean that he wasn't anti-Semitic. Arthur Balfour himself was as anti-Semitic as they come and had opposed Jewish immigration into Britain. Churchill in early 1920 wrote a really quite vicious anti-Semitic piece in the Illustrated Sunday Herald and of course wasn't actually disposed to lift a finger to assist the drowning Jews of Europe.
That is in part why I think you are wasting your time and a great deal of other people's money with this European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism of yours. You should be devoting your great energies, not to mention your not inconsiderable intellectual powers and unquestionable eloquence, on helping persuade the Jews of Europe to leave that truly evil continent once and for all. Now that would be truly a wonderful mitzvah. Wealthy British Jews will be lining up to fund this institute because they want to believe there is a cure for anti-Semitism. They have too much invested in the country to believe anything else. They are as wrong as they could be and so are you.
Incidentally, King Feisal of Hijaz (later King of Iraq) was an ardent Zionist:
Agreement Between the King of Hijaz and Khadim al-Haramayn as-Sharifayn, Emir Feisal Ibn al-Hussein al-Hashemi, and the President of the World Zionist Organization, Dr. Chaim Weizmann (January 3, 1919)
And
Letter by Emir Feisal to Felix Frankfurter, President of the Zionist Organisation of America + reply
http://www.amislam.com/feisal.htm
My father told me many things about that region - he was there during the war and it was his contention also that only the jews could make anything of the area.
Thanks for that link.
Fascinating.

