November 04
2006
Directions
» Posted on November 4, 2006 12:29 PM » Category: General

NHS.JPG

Well, er, yes...


MessageSpace
Comments

Haha.

Nearly as good as a car park signs in Swindon ( or Coventry, I forget which) yesterday. Someone hacked into the software and changed the electronic signs. They told customers to f**k off.

Stated by: Jeremycj on November 4, 2006 4:19 PM

This is advice which American teenagers appear to have taken very much to heart. This in 2005 from William Saletan in Slate:

Ass Backwards

'There's no delicate way to put this, so I'll just quote the survey report: "For males, the proportion who have had anal sex with a female increases from 4.6 percent at age 15 to 34 percent at ages 22–24; for females, the proportion who have had anal sex with a male increases from 2.4 percent at age 15 to 32 percent at age 22–24." One in three women admits to having had anal sex by age 24. By ages 25 to 44, the percentages rise to 40 for men and 35 for women. And that's not counting the 3.7 percent of men aged 15 to 44 who've had anal sex with other men.'

'Why does this matter? Because anal sex is far more dangerous than oral sex. According to data released earlier this year by the Centers for Disease Control, the probability of HIV acquisition by the receptive partner in unprotected oral sex with an HIV carrier is one per 10,000 acts. In vaginal sex, it's 10 per 10,000 acts. In anal sex, it's 50 per 10,000 acts. Do the math. Oral sex is 10 times safer than vaginal sex. Anal sex is five times more dangerous than vaginal sex and 50 times more dangerous than oral sex. Presumably, oral sex is far more frequent than anal sex. But are you confident it's 50 times more frequent?

A CDC fact sheet explains the risks of anal sex. First, "the lining of the rectum is thin and may allow the [HIV] virus to enter the body." Second, "condoms are more likely to break during anal sex than during vaginal sex." These risks don't just apply to HIV. According to the new survey report, the risk of transmission of other sexually transmitted diseases is likewise "higher for anal than for oral sex," and the risk "from oral sex is also believed to be lower than for vaginal intercourse." '

http://www.slate.com/id/2126643/

Stated by: Joshua on November 5, 2006 2:01 PM

This most obvious signpost I've ever seen is an "elderly people crossing" sign directly opposite a graveyard.

Stated by: Joshua on November 5, 2006 2:06 PM

Reminds me of the "Slow -- Children" sign I once saw in front of a school for the mentally impaired.

Stated by: Kent on November 20, 2006 5:47 PM
Post a comment

    


    •