August 20
2006
Where are the protests now?
» Posted on August 20, 2006 03:52 PM » Category: Terror

Remember those protests from Israel-haters such as Ming Campbell, who would rather Israel wasn't defended against terror, when it was noticed that US planes were taking off with weapons for Israel from Prestwick? And who believes that Britain should not sell arms to Israel?

I'm fascinated to see when they will protest about this:


Hezbollah night-vision gear was from Britain, Israel says

It's believed to be an export to Iran in drug-fighting effort

Matthew Kalman, Chronicle Foreign Service
Sunday, August 20, 2006

(8-20) 04:00 PDT Kiryat Shemona, Israel -- Israeli intelligence officials have complained to Britain and the United States that sensitive night-vision equipment recovered from Hezbollah fighters during the war in Lebanon had been exported by Britain to Iran. British officials said the equipment had been intended for use in a U.N. anti-narcotics campaign.

Israeli officials say they believe the state-of-the-art equipment, found in Hezbollah command-and-control headquarters in southern Lebanon during the just-concluded war, was part of a British government-approved shipment of 250 pieces of night-vision equipment sent to Iran in 2003.

Israeli military intelligence confirmed that one of the pieces of equipment is a Thermo-vision 1000 LR tactical night-vision system, serial No. 155010, part No. 193960, manufactured by Agema, a high-tech equipment company with branches in Bedfordshire, England, and San Diego. A spokesman for Agema in San Diego denied all knowledge of the system.

The equipment, which needed special export-license approval from the British government, was passed to the Iranians through a program run and administered by the U.N. Drug Control Program. The equipment uses infrared imaging to provide nighttime surveillance that allows the user to detect people and vehicles moving in the dark at a range of several miles.

Use of such equipment would have enabled Hezbollah to detect and record the movements of Israeli forces inside Israel, as well as its military advance into Lebanon.

So come on, Sir Ming, let's hear your protest. Or are you an Israel-hating hypocrite?

The silence of the protests is deafening.


MessageSpace
Comments

Ming Campbell - such an appropriate name.


Stated by: Joshua on August 20, 2006 5:35 PM

This doesn't quite work, Stephen. Anyone could argue - as Campbell most certainly would - that the UK was innocent and that it was Iran who acted in bad faith and broke the terms of sale by passing the gear to Hezbollah, and that the UK is just an innocent victim of Iran's duplicity. Now, I personally would not be willing to let the UK off the hook so easily; I certainly don't trust British officialdom, which as anyone who is honest knows is ridden with paternalistic, sympathetic Orientalism and poisonous, sanctimonious, imperious antisemitism - but it's hard to prove any of this and in the meantime it's easy enough to "prove" that the UK was acting innocently (if, in reality, with intentional, knowing "innocence").

Stated by: Paul on August 21, 2006 7:25 AM

Paul,

that's true, but in order to take that line, they would really have to plead "naivete". I would be very happy for the FCO to take that line. I'm just not sure that they would....

PG

Stated by: The Pedant-General on August 21, 2006 11:15 AM

" Or are you an Israel-hating hypocrite?"

Well he is certainly blinkered in respect of Israel.
His Observer op-ed showed concern for Lebanese/Hizbollah, but overlooked the death, evacuation & bunker living of Israeli civilians, noting only

"the plight of the nearly 1,000 killed, thousands injured and hundreds of thousands removed from their homes and livelihoods in Lebanon"

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1854244,00.html

Stated by: Skircoat on August 21, 2006 11:59 AM
Post a comment

    


    •