June 16
2006
Clever but poor? Sorry, your child has less hope of making it now than 40 years ago (Daily Mail)
» Posted on June 16, 2006 09:26 AM » Category: Education

Back in 1975, I passed the 11-plus exam. Normally, this would have meant going to St Nicholas’ the fine local grammar school. However, the ruling political dogma held that education was primarily about social engineering, and that learning was an almost irrelevant afterthought.

As a result, just months after passing the exam, the local education authority abolished St Nicholas’, and merged it with two other schools to become the giant Northwood Comprehensive.

So my mother and father sacrificed my family’s annual holidays and made do with a second hand car, so they could afford to send me to a private school.

I got a good education, but thousands of other bright children were denied that chance because their local grammar was closed down, and their parents simply could not afford the fees to send them privately.

Once one of the country’s finest assets, all but a tiny number – around 160 – of grammar schools were swept away as comprehensives, beloved by the country’s opinion formers in the 1960s and still by today’s educationalists, took over.

It is no wonder that yesterday’s report by the Sutton Trust, and educational charity, showed that media professions are more dominated than ever by the products of private schools. The same goes for all professional jobs in today’s Britain.

The bitter truth is that far from creating greater equality in schooling, the abolition of most grammars served only to widen this educational apartheid.

Indeed, there is less social mobility than there has been since the 1950s.

The Sutton Trust looked at the education of 100 leading media opinion-formers. Fifty four per cent had been to private schools, compared with 49 per cent 20 years ago. Of the rest, thirty-three per cent had been to grammar schools. Just 14 per cent came from comprehensive schools – which educate 90 per cent of all pupils.

An earlier study showed a similar story in the legal profession. Almost 70 per cent of barristers from the leading chambers were educated at private schools.

So entrenched is this dominance that it feels almost pre-ordained. But it is wholly man-made – or rather, made by the egalitarian educational reforms of the 1960s.

In the late 1960s, state grammar schools and non-state direct grant schools (privately run schools where the state bought a large number of places for pupils) easily outclassed the traditional private school in academic merit.

The proportion of private-school-educated undergraduates at Oxford, for instance, was on a steady downward path after the Second World War.

In 1946, 57 per cent of female students were from private schools. So successful were grammar schools, however, at giving educational opportunities to children who had previously never been stretched, that by 1967 the proportion had fallen to 39 per cent.

Private schools were, then, often for dunces whose parents simply bought them access to the cachet of the school’s name.

The bright grammar-school pupil, given a leg up from poverty and unprecedented access to education and opportunity, often fared far better. The country was as close as it has ever been to being a true meritocracy.

But the triumph of the ideologues who pushed for the abolition of grammar schools, meant that by the end of the next decade, we had taken a huge leap backwards. In 1971, 35 per cent of state schools were comprehensive. By 1981 that figure had risen to over 90 per cent.

The impact was immediate. The proportion of privately educated Oxford undergraduates shot up, and has continued to do so ever since. Today state school pupils comprise barely more than half of Oxford entrants.

Grammar schools either went comprehensive and lost their academic success, or jumped ship and became private schools.

This had a knock-on effect on private schools. Faced with new local competition from ex-grammar schools which charged far less, lacking the social cachet, the private schools had to up the ante, and refocused themselves on providing an even better education.

The publication of league tables in the 1990s made the difference between the state and private sector all too stark. The early tables, for instance, showed that 80 per cent of 15-year-olds at private schools achieved five or more grade A-C passes at GCSE. State schools managed that for just 43 per cent of pupils.

It is the ultimate irony. The dogmatists who pushed through the comprehensive revolution claimed to be concerned above all with opportunity and equality. But the only opportunity they expanded was that of private schools to take ever greater numbers of pupils, and the only equality they managed was to level pupils’ achievement down.

Perhaps the worst aspect of this national tragedy is the hypocrisy which governs the debate. The very people who refuse to countenance the return of grammar schools are, more often than not, those who have benefited from them.

The media – not least the BBC – portrays those who call for the return of grammar schools as backward looking fuddy-duddies.

Yet the BBC’s own staffing shows how much it has benefited from grammar schooling. Of the 31 leading BBC employees examined in the report, just one – a behind the scenes producer - was educated at a comprehensive.

All the familiar names were either educated privately, such as Jeremy Paxman and Kirsty Walk, or at a selective school, such as Fiona Bruce, Huw Edwards and Nick Robinson.

Politicians are even worse in their hypocrisy. Seven of today’s Cabinet went to a grammar school and just five come from comprehensive schools. The rest were either privately educated or educated in Scotland, where traditional teaching methods still held sway.

Even amongst the comprehensive children, only two - John Prescott and Jacqui Smith – went to what one might call a ‘normal’ comprehensive. Yet these are the very people who refuse to allow others to have access to the same quality of education which they were given.

Labour is often blamed for the ruin of our education system, but it was a Conservative Education Secretary who closed more grammar schools than either Tony Crosland or Shirley Williams.

Her name? Margaret Thatcher. And her party is little better today. One of David Cameron’s first statements as leader was to say “absolutely clearly, the Conservative party that I am leading does not want to go back to the 11-plus, does not want to go back to the grammar school system.".

Mr Cameron’s remark typifies the Alice In Wonderland state of our education debate. The evidence shows clearly that we once had a thriving, wonderfully successful string of state schools –which were responsible for giving opportunities to many of our leading national figures.

Yet mention of that system is now forbidden. Politicians and the chattering classes rule out any return to selection as somehow beyond the pale.

What is truly beyond the pale – and little short of immoral – is, rather, the dogmatic refusal to give today’s children the same opportunities that so benefited today’s opinion formers.


MessageSpace
Comments

The simplest way to ensure that people educated at private schools aren't over-represented in the activities you mention is completely to abolish private education. Anything less will obviously fail.

Stated by: Michael Taylor on June 16, 2006 12:41 PM

Only in Britain in 21st century could anyone suggest the authoritarian expedient of criminalising those who choose to spend their taxed income on promoting the welfare of their children. In any case, where do you stop? Ban private out-of-school music lessons? Trips to cultural events? Privately-organised foreign exchanges which enable a child to earn a foreign language? Outside tutoring of any kind?

I also suspect the European Court of Human Rights would have something to say about such idea.

Stated by: Michael McGowan on June 16, 2006 2:08 PM

Socialism is the greatest crime against humanity ever perpetrated.

It has ruined the lives of hundreds of millions of people in Britain and elsewhere. Interesting that Tony Blair's little yob Euan is going the elite route. No suprise, though

Stated by: Verity on June 16, 2006 2:20 PM

completely to abolish private education.

What a completely nasty suggestion.

I am the product of a comprehensive school and if I can afford it, I will definitely send my children to a private school. Anything less would be a dereliction of duty.

I do think though that the old system was only slightly better than the new one. There should be far more diversity of schools than just two types.

Stated by: Serf on June 16, 2006 3:00 PM

Serf - provided by who? The government? The Tony and Cherie Blairs and the Jack Straws and the Patricia Hewitts can be trusted to make decisions about schools? I. think. not.

Vouchers and the private sector is the only answer to Britain's tenth rate education system. As a point of interest, school children in Singapore are taking their O level courses using British A level papers.

Stated by: Verity on June 16, 2006 3:31 PM

>As a result, just months after passing the exam, the local education authority abolished St Nicholas’, and merged it with two other schools to become the giant Northwood Comprehensive.

So either you went to a private school that didn't teach you about misplaced modifiers, or your local authority took the 11-plus.

Stated by: chris on June 16, 2006 3:48 PM

Quite true. It is also astounding that Grammar schools had developed since Shakespeare's day and the North of England depended on State Grammar Schools and direct-grant powerhouses like Manchester GS and Bradford GS............most of the public schools were in The South.

A city like Bradford which once had very high quality State Grammar school producing Nobel Prize Winners like Appleton now has a degenerate Comprehensive system near the bottom of national league tables.

That the Conservatives were led by Grammar School products 1965-2005 was a break with tradition which Cameron has reasserted with the Bertie Wooster Factor of Old Etonians and moneyed access breeding contempt for the Northern Grammar School boy so typical of Bullingdon Club members at Oxford University.

It was Edward Boyle as Education Secretary who started the Comprehensive ball rolling and the Conservatives were too Southern and too prone to be privately educated to understand what it meant to get a scholarship

Stated by: Rick on June 16, 2006 7:19 PM

Stephen Pollard is spot on.

As a professor of English, whose recent conference diatribes have been on Political Correctness and the demise of English in the 70s and 80s, the enormous damage wreaked by the ideologues such as Neale et al is incalculable.

Most of the textbooks today for ESL or EFL were written by those educated as Generation X ers and it shows in the shaky grammatical assertions which any of the previous generation would immediately recognize as ludicrous.

Moving to the demise of Grammar Schools - this is yet another example of the major disservice done to the majority children of this country and of the English speaking world as a whole.

Add text messaging and the zombyization is now complete.

As for the hypocrisy referred to in the minds of the movers and shakers, it is extraordinarily difficult to understand what is actually running through their minds with such decisions.

Stated by: James Higham on June 17, 2006 6:44 AM

Error, sorry - by Neale, I meant A.S.Neill of Summerhill 1921, whose school still wreaks havoc but not on a worldwide scale. In the 70s and 80s, open plan education was largely influenced by his experiments with children. The colonies, in particular, followed suit.

Stated by: James Higham on June 17, 2006 12:12 PM

"... the enormous damage wreaked by the ideologues ...". James Higham, surely, as a professor of English, you know that the past tense of "wreak" is "wrought"?

Stated by: Verity on June 17, 2006 1:23 PM

This is absolutely and depressingly right. This egalitarian educational fantasy has destroyed educational opportunities for the less well off, and restrained social mobility.

It gets worse. Labour destroyed the best education system in the world, and they are now doing it to health care as well. Just as the education system has been dumbed down to the lowest common-denominator, so has health care. Anyone can be a teacher now. All you need is enthusiasm. Enter the “teaching assistants”. And in hospitals, it is the “nurse-specialist,” the “EMT” and all sorts of “Health care professionals”. Health care profession is New Labour speak for “there is no doctor available”.

The “great and the good” do not use comprehensive schools. Increasingly, the “great and the good” do not use the NHS either. They go privately so that they can see a properly trained doctor.

Margaret Thatcher was grammar school educated. It could not happen now. The Blair children were rescued from their local comprehensive. And so it goes on.

Until the “great and the good” start using the NHS and the state education system they will remain in decline.

BW


John

Stated by: Dr John Crippen on June 17, 2006 2:44 PM

Dearest Verity,

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/wreak?view=uk

wreak
• verb 1 cause (a large amount of damage or harm). 2 inflict (vengeance).
— USAGE The past tense of wreak is wreaked, as in rainstorms wreaked havoc yesterday, not wrought. When wrought is used in the phrase wrought havoc, it is in fact an archaic past tense of work.
— ORIGIN Old English, drive (out), avenge; related to WRECK and WRETCH.

Now, the truth - I thought as you did, Verity, that I had got it wrong and the visage went red, I can tell you. It was pure luck that Oxford came up with this.

You and I are always meeting on Stephen's site - maybe we should meet.

Stated by: James Higham on June 17, 2006 3:03 PM

Yes, of course wreak is OE. It is a weak verb, in that it changes its form to make the past tense. But do you say "wreaked-iron"? When you are distressed, are you over-wreaked?

Even Fowler notes that wrought is on the decline which I think is a great pity, not just because wreaked dumbs down our language for people who can't remember, but wrought is a nice word.

Anyway, it's moot (if that is still a word) given that in 10 years all parts of speech will have been declared old-fashioned in the face of texting.

I am a very long way from Britain, I'm afraid.

Stated by: Verity on June 17, 2006 3:22 PM

Positively the last from me, Stephen, before you throw me off your site and close down the comments section, I promise; but Verity is intriguing - I also am 2453 miles from London. Long live the expats. Interesting last comment about 'wreak' dumbing down English. Wrought is a fine word and the more of such vocabulary we can keep in the lexicon the better.

Stated by: James Higham on June 17, 2006 3:38 PM

An excellent article. I had the benefit of attending one of those 160 or so state grammar schools which survived the closures of the seventies. In the year I left my school surpassed Eton in the 'A' level league tables and sent 100% of my year to university, 20% to Oxbridge. This despite the alleged handicap of 30+ pupils per class and decrepit buildings.

Stated by: Noel Cooper on June 18, 2006 12:07 AM

I hate the hard left. I absolutely hate them and wish them ill. I hope Tony, in his leisure time, slinking down a corridor at No 10, breaks a heel.

Clever children who could contribute not just to themselves and their own futures, but to the country, jettisoned by individuals who don't want our ancient country to survive. I have no respect for the British because it was so obvious from day one, and they went along with the gag. Well, now they're gagged. Get out of that one.

Stated by: Verity on June 18, 2006 3:13 AM

Dr. John Crippen correctly points out, the “great and the good” do not use comprehensive schools nor increasingly use the NHS either. They go privately so that they can see a properly trained doctor. This must change and thankfully there are a growing number of policymakers that believe they should lead by example by actually using the services they have created. Putting his money where his mouth is on the issue of healthcare, Brian Jenkins MP has for instance just signed a petition promising he will never seek private healthcare. The Tamworth Herald quoted Mr. Jenkins on 15th June as saying "I have always used the National Health Service in the past and I wouldn't want to use private healthcare in the future". "I want everyone to know that I am an NHS user just as they are and that we are determined to secure its future." Mr. Jenkins is one of 34 MP’s who have signed the new health petition that can also be signed by the general public at www.ourpetition.org. Will the other 95% of policymakers also sign the petition? Much depends upon the action or inaction of ordinary citizens. Only if the petition gets enough signatures from ordinary citizens will the issue of healthcare be placed on the political agenda in time for the next general election. Democracy is after all about electing policymakers that work for the people and not the other way around.

Stated by: Richard Solomon on June 18, 2006 9:48 AM

Stephen rails against: "the dogmatic refusal to give today’s children the same opportunities that so benefited today’s opinion formers."

Precisely.

They don't want anyone that well-educated, and that well taught to think, ever again. Because the new ruling class has been installed.

They were the last generation to benefit from a real education and they are now the generation in power. Forever. Their children, educated at private schools (not comprehensives - heaven forefend!) and overseas, will be the next rulers - not governors - because our British children have been betrayed ... and taught texting, basket-weaving and foreign religions with no reference to their glorious history or where they came from.

I had a dull sense of inevitability when Blair got in. It will take another 20 years to scrape him off the soles of British shoes, if that indeed happens before Britain is subsumed by a Napoleonic Europe and, eventually, through the open door of Turkey, Islam.


Stated by: Verity on June 19, 2006 1:15 AM


外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

外来媳妇本地郎
哑巴新娘
终极一班
爱情魔发师
恶作剧之吻
人鱼小姐
巴黎恋人
大唐双龙传
王子变青蛙
半路夫妻
恶魔在身边
争霸传奇
石破天惊
爱在离别时
我和僵尸有个约会
粉领一族
深情密码
我的女孩
最后之舞
亮剑
百万新娘
天国的嫁衣
光辉岁月
神雕侠侣
武林外传
对不起,我爱你
白袍之恋
大长今
豪杰春香
刁蛮公主
白蛇传
天外飞仙
火花
东方茱丽叶
皇太子的初恋
火舞黄沙
火花游戏
天若有情
血色浪漫
法证先锋
大清后宫
侠客行
蓝色生死恋
天国的阶梯
战神
火力少年王

Stated by: asdf on July 1, 2006 2:56 AM

美女视频录像
激情自拍录像
三级片
免费成人电影
免费黄色电影
免费激情电影
免费色情电影
免费性交电影
免费性爱电影
三级片
美女视频录像
人体艺术图辑
黄色网站
色情
色情网站
成人网站
三级片
三级片
三级片
三级片
三级片
三级片
黄色网站
激情小电影
激情小电影
艺术激情享受
激情小电影
日本强奸电影
郎裸体图库
林心如拍黄的图片
性生活片电影在线
性感丝袜美女图片
玉蒲团之玉女心经
十八淫书
色兔妹妹图片
全球十大禁片bt下载
性交裸体图
亚洲成人淫民网
妹妹厕所走光图片
视频聊天
成人电影
黄色电影
激情电影
色情电影
性交电影
性爱电影
免费电影网
免费在线电影
看免费电影
免费电影网站
最新韩国电影
两性生活
性教育片
免费电影神话
最新电影无极
免费激情电影
免费黄色电影
最新电影下载
成人性爱电影
美女图片
美女走光
美腿图片
三级片
强奸电影
美女祼体图片
黄色电影下载
免费色情电影
性感美女图片
漂亮妹妹图片
做爱图片
美少女
幼女图片
舒淇写真集舒淇全裸照
偷窥电影偷窥小说偷窥图片
美女被强歼小说
巨乳小电影免费下载
美女厕所偷窥
视频mm自拍艳舞
仙人洞美女
一个馒头引发的血案
神雕侠侣
少妇
美女 美女图
明星露点写真
裸体写真 明星裸体写真
人体艺术写真
美臀
女人图片 性感美女图片
女性乳房 女性乳房写真
女人屁股 女性屁股 偷拍
偷拍女人的图片
18 贴 图 台湾 成人
男同性恋写真图片
午夜天堂成人小说-午夜天堂成人电影
台湾网络小说 台湾网络电影
小龙女与尹志平
图片性闻
美女洗澡小游戏 美女洗澡偷拍电影
艳舞
成人图库
女明星图片
丁字裤
免费电影在线看
免费电视连续剧收看
美臀 翘臀 图片
少妇展穴
色影无忌
三级片
性感美女床上自拍
三级片
免费成人电影
免费黄色电影
免费色情电影
免费成人电影
免费色情电影
免费黄色电影
免费成人电影
免费黄色电影
免费黄色电影
免费色情电影
免费色情电影
床第间的正点自拍
露点图片
女性最易献身时刻
自拍DV
偷拍录象
美女诱惑写真自拍短片
人体艺术另类
成人小说
黄色网站
成人论坛
成人图片
走光
三级片
视频录像激情视频
18dy-脱轨电影,tuogui
性感美女床上自拍
色情影音-激情写真media情色
激动电影-18dy
18dy-激动电影
免费小电影
性电影
免费成人电影下载
免费电影在线观看
宽带电影
经典电影下载
免费恐怖电影
免费影片下载
免费影院
最新大片
十八电影网
美女写真
人体艺术
日本av电影
情色电影
同志电影下载
激情视频下载
明星露点图片
写真电影
阴部图片
乳房图片
人体写真
美国大片
免费成人影片
在线看电影
成人网站
乳房 图 奸淫
极品嫩穴图片
美女插穴
黄色小说
在线激情电影
性教育电影
两性电影
看电影的网站
免费看电影
免费在线电影
免费电影下载

Stated by: 激情自拍录像 on July 1, 2006 3:21 AM
Post a comment

    


    •