April 18
2006
The Maida Vale Manifesto

As the lack posts over the past couple of weeks shows, I've had other things to do and have not been in touch with the blogosphere. I'm back now. The most striking development is that The Euston Manifesto seems to be everywhere at the moment.

Much as I wish its signatories luck, I think they’re fighting a losing - lost - battle. So here’s my version. I'll call it The Maida Vale Manifesto.

If anyone else wants to sign it, email me and I'll post your name. But I don't expect to be flooded with emails. I suspect I'll have to change the 'we' to 'I'.

I'm also going to try an experiment. As readers may know, I had to remove comments because it took so long for me to read everything and delete the libellous and racist remarks which were being posted.

I do miss having comments. There's nothing I like better than a good argument with people who think I'm wrong. So I'm allowing them on this post, and will see how it goes. If people can behave like civilied human beings then hopefully I'll be able to return to full comments on every post. But if the same old problems emerge, I will unhesitatingly close them down.

Sorry to sound like a school teacher, but it has to be said.

*******************************

The Maida Vale Manifesto

We the undersigned have always thought of ourselves as being on the Left. We have held it as axiomatic that the Left believed in fighting tyranny, liberating the oppressed, and spreading wealth and power.

We have had a rude awakening. When terrorists murdered thousands of American citizens, many of our fellow leftists blamed not the terrorists so much as Americans themselves. They had it coming seemed to be the view of many, if not most, of the Left.

This attitude was typified by the Left’s house magazine, the New Statesman, which wrote this in its editorial after 9/11:

“American bond traders, you may say, are as innocent and as undeserving of terror as Vietnamese or Iraqi peasants. Well, yes and no. Yes, because such large-scale carnage is beyond justification, since it can never distinguish between the innocent and the guilty. No, because Americans, unlike Iraqis and many others in poor countries, at least have the privilege of democracy and freedom that allow them to vote and speak in favour of a different order. If the US often seems a greedy and overweening power, that is partly because its people have willed it. They preferred George Bush to Al Gore and both to Ralph Nader.”

This piece of moral degeneracy was far from being a one-off. In the aftermath of 9/11, we were shocked by the frequent incidence of similar sentiments. The New Statesman again typified this after last July’s tube murders, with a picture of a rucksack on its cover, accompanied by two words in large font: Blair’s bombs.

There are many decent people on the Left, who understand the difference between good and evil, and who do not ally themselves with terrorists, murderers and oppressors. The Prime Minister himself is an outstanding example of this, risking his political support within his party to do the right thing at the right time.

But the very fact that supporting the liberation of Iraq from Saddam entailed such a political risk says almost all that needs to be said about the outlook of most Labour Party MPs and members.

Add to this the relish with which large, mainstream sections of the Left – typified by the Mayor of London - now choose to ally themselves with Islamists who seek to destroy the essence of Western civilisation, who would put to death homosexuals and Jews, and who would put women in metaphorical – and sometimes literal – chains, and the moral cancer that has taken hold of the Left becomes clear.

The evidence of reality is something with which we have had to wrestle. It is not easy to acknowledge what the Left has become, and the mindset of leftists. But that evidence is so overwhelming that we can no longer conceive of describing ourselves as being on the Left in any recognisable form.

Theoretical arguments about what is or is not a proper left-wing position are now meaningless. The mainstream Left has demonstrated clearly which side of the battle to preserve Western civilisation and freedom it is on. The Left, in any recognisable form, is now the enemy.

Stephen Pollard


MessageSpace
Comments

Here, here!

Stated by: Gareth Russell on April 18, 2006 10:57 AM

I have to say it lacks a certain something, sorry, but itdoes. Nick Cohen emailed after the Euston one to say that he had been arguing for the following to be added to theirs:

"We utterly reject Tim Worstall, Worstallism and all Worstallites."

All manifetoes would be greatly improved by the addition ofthat line.

Other than that, of course, you’re spot on.

Stated by: Tim Worstall on April 18, 2006 11:09 AM

"Theoretical arguments about what is or is not a proper left-wing position are now meaningless."

They always were and always have been. Left-liberals are inherently contradictory: the lack of freedom from state enforced economic collectivism cannot survive if there is individual freedom. It is an inherently unstable system.

It is why, taking an example entirely from thin air, you no longer show up on the "left" of the political compass.

Until the "left" of whatever persuasion recognises that equality of outcome is inherently and manifestly unjust, it will always be irrelevent. Unfortunately, anyone making such a recognition is no longer of the "left" as that is its defining characteristic...

Toodle Pip!
PG

Stated by: The Pedant-General on April 18, 2006 12:37 PM

I'm really pleased that comments are back.

Unfortunately I have nothing sensible to contribute to this thread.

But thanks, anyway.

Stated by: Bob Doney on April 18, 2006 6:10 PM

What Bob Doney said. I don't have anything to contribute either, but I hope the comments are back permanently.

Stated by: Verity on April 18, 2006 6:54 PM

Congratulations, Stephen, on achieving the impossible: with your Maida Vale Manifesto you've made the Euston Manifesto look popular, well thought out, and worthwhile. Are you doing it on purpose to make them look good?

Stated by: StuartA on April 18, 2006 7:37 PM

With you all the way.

Stated by: Richard Watson on April 18, 2006 9:18 PM

Bravo. As I wrote at my blog, if I considered myself a man of the Left, I'd sign it.

Stated by: Michael Greenspan on April 18, 2006 9:53 PM

Stephen,

'The left in any recognisable form, is now the enemy?' When did you concede to those who claim to be on the left what strike me as avowedly leftwing principles simply because they shout louder and control the guardian editorial pages? I think we all need a little bit more back bone.

NC

Stated by: Nick C on April 18, 2006 10:37 PM

Stephen whilst I am not of the Left anymore I couldn't agree with you more and so would be proud to have you add my name to your Maida Vale manifesto.

Stated by: Matt Davis on April 18, 2006 10:53 PM

You could not be more correct. One only has to look at the reporting by some of the media and at the comments by some bloggers following the Tel Aviv bomb to see how their hatred of America and Israel has totally blinded the Left to anything approaching the truth.

Stated by: Barry Kester on April 19, 2006 7:47 AM

As someone who has never considered himself to be "of the left", I can't sign up to your manifesto. I do, however, agree with everything in it.

BTW, so glad to see the comments back, and hope they remain.
I would like to have been able to comment on the polystyrene box, with a mound of parmesan foam inside, but even now I remain speechless.

Stated by: Rob on April 19, 2006 9:01 AM

I will not sign your manifesto and consider your head is stuck deep in the sand.
I supported the war in Iraq but there is no doubt in my mind that it has gone seriously wrong and all thanks to the Bush administration.
They have given a million tons of ammunition to the anti-war movement.

Stated by: Nicholas Kissen on April 19, 2006 11:44 AM

I signed the Euston Manisfesto but will not bother with your one.

I supported the war but there is no doubt that it has gone seriously wrong and all thanks to the combination of malevolence and incompetence of the Bush administration.They have given a million tons of ammunition to the anti-war movement.

Stated by: Nicholas Kissen on April 19, 2006 11:48 AM

Well, your Manifesto should at least attempt bare logical consistency. You can't acknowledge Tony Blair (plus, presumably, his supporters) as both Left and "decent" in one paragraph and declare that "The Left, in any recognisable form, is now the enemy" in another. I mean, it just doesn't make any sense.

Maybe this is a satirical illustration of that power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously.

Stated by: Marc Mulholland on April 19, 2006 1:03 PM

When were you ever a member of the left?

For at least five years, you've pursued an aggressively pro-Israel, pro-US foreign policy, campaigned against the NHS, and advocated spending public money on private school vouchers. You've moaned about high taxes, and retailed (and written) Adam Smith Institute propaganda. In that time you've never identified with a recognisably left-wing position. Yet, apparently on the strength of once being a Blairite Labour Party researcher, you claim to have only just broken from the left.

This "manifesto" announces nothing except that you now view the term “left-wing” as “meaningless” -- which it plainly is in your hands.

Stated by: StuartA on April 19, 2006 4:16 PM

Hasn't always been the case that 'the left' were 'rightists' in disguise? The whole history of the 20th Century, starting with the 'glorious' October Revolution (1917) is virtually litered with such examples. The present situation just perpetuates many precedents. And what about the so-called Labor spin? They've just adopted the abhorent methods used by the'dear leaders' of 'socialist' countries before the 1989 revolutions who, at'party congresses' , were boasting about huge increases in production whilst outside people were shivering in the cold, had no light, and were spending nights and days queuing for basic foodstuffs. Yes, 'the left' does have a 'glorious' tradition of which it should be profoundly ashamed .

Stated by: spiradole on April 20, 2006 12:46 AM

I come for the polystyrene, but I stay for the foam. I'm optimistic enough to think that the "left" will soon be up for grabs. The version of leftism that makes excuses for Islamic fascism is largely a product of the 1960s counter-culture, which defined itself as rejecting everything previous generations had believed in, and which was also influenced by covert and overt Soviet propaganda. It ended up rejecting everything Western in favour of anything else it could find. But the members of that generation and their immediate successors have reached the zenith of their influence as writers, editors, film-makers, etc. and are reaching the end of their careers. The times that formed them are a distant memory, the Soviet Union is history, and an awareness of harsh reality is forcing itself onto anyone capable of even vaguely perceiving it.

New Labour has gained power, but has failed to create any clear ideology that could outlive the careers of its dominant figures.

So the Eustonians represent the only segment of the left that has any new thinking and is willing to unambiguously oppose Islamic imperialism. Those things alone give them a critical advantage over the types of leftist they oppose when it comes to building support among the wider (i.e. not political obsessives) public. The fact that they are getting serious attention from the Guardian and the New Statesman, the journals of the left-wing establishment, show how much momentum they have already built up. It is certainly possible that they will become the mainstream left and reclaim it for the cause of civilisation, and everyone who cares about the survival of the West should hope that they succeed.

Stated by: Andrew Zalotocky on April 20, 2006 4:10 AM

I agree with everything in this statement, but I won't call myself a "liberal" anymore.

The Left no longer seems to include anyone who values Western civilization as it actually is. It seems filled with people who say "yes but" and offer a series of "corrections" and "improvements" while entirely missing the very real threat of an ideology that cannot and will not co-exist with democracies.

Someday I'd like the choice of voting for a libertarian vs a Republican but I will never vote for a Democrat again, nor will I vote in such a way as to increase the chance a Democrat gets into office.

Stated by: Bostonian on April 21, 2006 12:55 AM

For a long time, the terms "Left" and "Liberal" have been used interchangeably, at least in America, and I think this has been the source of much confusion.

Liberalism got drunk, was seduced by Leftism, and appears to be waking up, looking in horror at the whore in bed, and jumping out.

Personally, I like the term, "Classical Liberal," as it refers to a pre-Left wing version of liberalism - an emphasis on economic, political, and social freedom. Not without it's own challenges and contradictions, but definitely something that should be differentiated from Leftism (communism, collectivism, anti-capitalism.) as Mr. Pollard is doing here.

Stated by: Randall on April 21, 2006 12:52 PM

And another thing"! (Boy, bring comments back and some people just can't quit.)

Another source of terminological confusion is that, since "Leftism" and "Liberalism" have been confused for so long, some Non-Leftist Liberals feel the need to "take back" Leftism, and criticize the direction the Left has taken, when, in fact, the Left is doing what it is supposed to do - Attacking capitalism, and forming alliances with even the most illiberal groups that share its hatred of capitalism.

Right Wing Liberals of World Unite!

Stated by: Randall on April 21, 2006 12:58 PM

As others have said, I would sign this manifesto, if I had considered myself to be on the left before 9/11, 2001. However, long before then, I had come to believe not only that central planning is evil, but also that the welfare state can (and usually does) destroy the work ethic and personal responsibility, and fosters hypocrisy. I don't want anybody to die from starvation or disease if it can be avoided, of course: if that's enough to make me left-wing then I'll sign the manifesto.

PS: The Pedant-General, Marc Mulholland, and others made very good points.

Stated by: Arthur Pece on April 21, 2006 4:58 PM
Stated by: oiuoui on April 25, 2006 6:50 AM

"One only has to look at the reporting by some of the media and at the comments by some bloggers following the Tel Aviv bomb to see how their hatred of America and Israel has totally blinded the Left to anything approaching the truth."

Just re read that whoever you are, and then ask yourself whether there might not just possibly be people on the far right who cheer the murder of Jews too. The fact is that there is a Right (and sometimes not so far Right) which is deeply unsympathetic to Israel and not quite signed up to the post 9/11 US agenda either. Michael Ancram's recent attempt to out Chamberlain Chamberlain in the appeasment stakes springs immediately to mind.

Stated by: Mark on April 25, 2006 12:25 PM
Stated by: goldhai on April 30, 2006 2:33 PM
Stated by: goldhai on May 4, 2006 2:06 AM

Well done for bringing back comments, but the bloody spam is already creeping back too. (See above).

Stated by: Luniversal on May 4, 2006 8:10 PM
Stated by: DSFA on May 8, 2006 1:23 PM

[http://bankruptcy.paginas.slbenfica.pt/ bankruptcy]
[http://bond.paginas.slbenfica.pt/ bond]
[http://broker.paginas.slbenfica.pt/ broker]
[http://debt.paginas.slbenfica.pt/ debt]
[http://degree.paginas.slbenfica.pt/ degree]
[http://airlines.paginas.slbenfica.pt/ airlines]

Stated by: goldhai on May 8, 2006 1:40 PM
Stated by: goldhai on May 10, 2006 3:11 AM

性交裸体图
美女视频录像
激情自拍录像
三级片
免费成人电影
免费黄色电影
免费激情电影
免费色情电影
免费性交电影
免费性爱电影
三级片
美女视频录像
人体艺术图辑
黄色网站
色情
色情网站
成人网站
三级片
三级片
三级片
三级片
三级片
三级片
黄色网站
激情小电影
激情小电影
艺术激情享受
激情小电影
日本强奸电影
郎裸体图库
林心如拍黄的图片
性生活片电影在线
性感丝袜美女图片
玉蒲团之玉女心经
十八淫书
色兔妹妹图片
全球十大禁片bt下载
性交裸体图
亚洲成人淫民网
妹妹厕所走光图片
视频聊天
成人电影
黄色电影
激情电影
色情电影
性交电影
性爱电影
情色电影
同志电影下载
激情视频下载
明星露点图片
写真电影
阴部图片
乳房图片
明星裸照
性爱视频
偷拍图片
免费电影网
免费在线电影
看免费电影
免费电影网站
最新韩国电影
两性生活
性教育片
免费电影神话
最新电影无极
免费激情电影
免费黄色电影
最新电影下载
成人性爱电影
美女图片
美女走光
美腿图片
三级片
强奸电影
美女祼体图片
黄色电影下载
免费色情电影
性感美女图片
漂亮妹妹图片
做爱图片
美少女
幼女图片
舒淇写真集舒淇全裸照
偷窥电影偷窥小说偷窥图片
美女被强歼小说
巨乳小电影免费下载
美女厕所偷窥
视频mm自拍艳舞
仙人洞美女
一个馒头引发的血案
神雕侠侣
少妇
美女 美女图
明星露点写真
裸体写真 明星裸体写真
人体艺术写真
美臀
女人图片 性感美女图片
女性乳房 女性乳房写真
女人屁股 女性屁股 偷拍
偷拍女人的图片
18 贴 图 台湾 成人
男同性恋写真图片
午夜天堂成人小说-午夜天堂成人电影
台湾网络小说 台湾网络电影
小龙女与尹志平
图片性闻
美女洗澡小游戏 美女洗澡偷拍电影
艳舞
成人图库
女明星图片
丁字裤
免费电影在线看
免费电视连续剧收看
美臀 翘臀 图片
少妇展穴
色影无忌
三级片
性感美女床上自拍
三级片
免费成人电影
免费黄色电影
免费色情电影
免费成人电影
免费色情电影
免费黄色电影
免费成人电影
免费黄色电影
免费黄色电影
免费色情电影
免费色情电影
床第间的正点自拍
露点图片
女性最易献身时刻
自拍DV
偷拍录象
美女诱惑写真自拍短片
人体艺术另类
成人小说
黄色网站
成人论坛
成人图片
走光
三级片
视频录像激情视频
18dy-脱轨电影,tuogui
性感美女床上自拍
色情影音-激情写真media情色
激动电影-18dy
18dy-激动电影
免费小电影
性电影
免费成人电影下载
免费电影在线观看
宽带电影
经典电影下载
免费恐怖电影
免费影片下载
免费影院
最新大片
十八电影网
美女写真
人体艺术
日本av电影
情色电影
同志电影下载
激情视频下载
明星露点图片
写真电影
阴部图片
乳房图片
人体写真
美国大片
免费成人影片
在线看电影
成人网站
乳房 图 奸淫
极品嫩穴图片
美女插穴
黄色小说
在线激情电影
性教育电影
两性电影
看电影的网站
免费看电影
免费在线电影
免费电影下载

Stated by: 激情自拍录像 on July 4, 2006 3:36 PM
Post a comment

    


    •