I found it quite troubling that this man went to such lengths to track you down and confront you in person about this matter, which was not at all relevant to the discussion of democracy and the blogosphere. I asked him afterward if he was the guy who had banged on about your weight, and he proudly confirmed that he was. I thought it strange that I knew of his comment if it had been deleted, but simply asked him, "And you are surprised your comment was deleted?"

Mr Senior seemed quite proud of his comment and regretful that it had, as he maintained, not been enshrined and left for all to read and admire. Having read it a second time, I am still left scratching my head as to what he thought was so admirable and intellectually damning about his remarks.

i agree with Stephen about half the time. Personal abusinve messages are not on. Someone, not Ian Senior, is paying for the bandwidth on this site.

I think this guy doesn't understand that old blogs go into archives? Stephen you are well within your rights to ban anyone you disagree with, or to remove comments in total. I hope you don't, but others have.

( he writes like a crank, incidently)

I have to agree with Jackie, and possibly go further. Beyond just defamatory remarks, this guy seems creepily obsessive. Does the UK have an anti-stalking statute?

Stephen. I was at this event and this chap's tirade against you made me look for and read your site for the first time. Is it possible to leave comments in green ink? Perhaps I should ask Mr Senior.

Recess Monkey

Further evidence that blogging is a haven for cranks, blowhards and provocateurs, and not the terrifying threat to the mainstream media which some of its practitioners pretend.

When did anything of import ever issue from Speakers' Corner? The blogosphere is just an bigger safety valve of the same kind, with the additional advantage (apart from rare encounters such as the one reported here) that the nutters and flame warriors don't even have to confront each other physically, and can remain anonymous.

Repressive tolerance at its best. What a clever Pentagon to have developed the Internet!

Read his comment, thought it hilarious and bizarre. Don't switch comments off though - it's much better that these things are exposed to the light of day.

You might well have a point about being slandered though! :)

Violets are my especial favourite. Better than being a stinkweed, I would suggest.

I think the whole thing smacks of handbags at twenty paces. Get some duelling pistols and sort it out properly.

As you said on the night Ian Senior made his comment 'Blogs are very good for checking facts'. Proven.

Rather amusing and troubling episode Stephen. I don't actually thing that this post is at all self-centred or odd. It does strike one as a bit odd that he would come to that event to challenge (and try to embarass) you about that something that did not in fact happen. Oh well, guess it proves you are widely known when you get cranks. (I tend to get the sort who believe the Necronomicon is real and that I somehow have a direct line to Lord Cthulhu.)

Satmarvellous: blogging is more useful that Speaker's Corner. I wonder how many people who prattled on at SC ever got regular writing gigs for major newspapers or book deals? There are quite a few bloggers (of which I am one) who have benefited in such a way from their bloggings.

Yes, yes, but how *is* the diet going? Or has it gone?

The 'deleted' comment seems to have been there in the Google cache, so it clearly did not 'just reappear'... so he does indeed appear to be talking out of a mid-body orifice.

When did anything of import ever issue from Speakers' Corner? The blogosphere is just an bigger safety valve of the same kind,...

I'd just like to point out that I have learnt a great deal from my experiences in the blogosphere. There is mud there, but also gemstones.

The ratio of mud to gemstones is far too high; and, as in every gold rush, most prospectors return broke and disappointed.

Effra - the solution is simple ...

STOP adding to the mud, dear !

(innocent grin)

I forget who it was said that 99 percent of everything is crap. Probably an American. It is just as true of the mainstream media as it is of the blogosphere. The blogosphere is just much vaster, so the prospecting tends to be a little more gruelling. But as a journalist, I find it an invaluable adjunct to the day-to-day copy stream. Apart from the 99 percent sewage. Talk radio is by far the most useless, time-wasting public forum extant.

BTW, I wonder if it would not be a good idea to tone down or eliminate the all-pervading green of your estimable site. Ten minutes of scrolling and the after-image is burnt into my retina. My keyboard has gone two-tone.

seher scuirts vagina squirt x@x seeher squirt squirting x@x seeher squirting squirt gay x@x tugjob cheerleaders gallery x@x tugjobs reality videos x@x toggjobs teen jpg x@x nauczycielki ostre kicie seks x@x niedoswiadczone ostre kicie seks x@x niegrzeczne ostre kicie seks x@x napalone panny majtki akty x@x amatorki majtki akty x@x seksolatki majtki akty x@x ostne niunie dupodajki porno x@x pikantne niunie dupodajki porno x@x napalone niunie dupodajki porno x@x seks krecone wlosy akty x@x porno krecone wlosy akty x@x erotyka krecone wlosy akty x@x seks krecone wlosy akty x@x porno krecone wlosy akty x@x erotyka krecone wlosy akty x@x

jpb ppyt psycholog zdrowa żywność nieruchomości projektowanie stron agencja reklamowa soczewki kontaktowe nauka angielskiego agroturystyka opony klimatyzacja domy opieki akupunktura hydraulik projektowanie wnętrz soha jpk paa ki wypadki tfrd jh sw jft pp fdr

asstraffic niki* asstraffic nikky* mature perfect pussy* mature perfect tit* nicole peters passwords* niki knockers* allinternal sandy* allinternal sexybabes sample movie* roun asses* cellulite butt fetish* hugecock* hummer sluts*