June 06
2004
A great man
» Posted on June 6, 2004 11:50 AM » Category: US politics

It seems somehow appropriate that news of the death of President Reagan should have come on this of all weekends. The ceremonies in Normandy commemorate the sacrifice and bravery of allied soldiers in freeing Europe from an evil regime. Reagan did more than any other politician in the post-war world to do the same thing.

This weekend's papers are unique in my recollection. I haven't spotted a single cynical comment about the D-Day commemorations. I can't remember another event which has not prompted at least one commentator to take a contrarian view. Yesterday and today - nada.

But you can bet that by tomorrow some of the press will be full of sarcastic comments about Reagan. I don't compare for a second the sacrifices made. The D-day veterans risked their lives, each of them genuinely deserving of that over-used word, brave. Reagan was a politician who, although he was the victim of an attempted assassination, in theory risked no more than electoral defeat.

Those, however, who will soon be sneering about him - just as they did when he was in power - might care to think about the good that he did. Just as no one soldier was responsible for the Allied powers' victory in 1945, so no one politician brought about the collapse of the Soviet Union. But in the reckoning of those who helped freedom to prevail, Reagan stands at the very top. Truly, a great man.


MessageSpace
Comments

He was easily the greatest president since FDR. Truman was the architect of the second half of the 20th century, and Johnson was the most successful legislative president, but Reagan was the only president of the the post-WW2 era to have achieved greatness in both domestic and foreign affairs. His legacy - the defeat of communism, the liberalisation of the American economy - is quite monumental.

There will indeed be much snide carping from the kind of people whose deluded beliefs were crushed during the 1980s. The leftist elites, including the likes of Galbraith and Schlesinger, have never forgiven Reagan for making their pessimistic predictions of Soviet permanence and economic superiority (which Galbraith was asserting as late as 1984) look so utterly preposterous.

But, ultimately, it is the opinion of ordinary Americans that matters. At Mount Rushmore, there is a book where visitors can write the name of the president they would most like to be added to the rockface. Guess who tops the list? It's not Jimmy Carter.

It would also be interesting to see the reaction of Eastern Europeans this morning. Their countries were suffering under the communist yoke only 15 years ago. They are now vibrant, sovereign, democratic members of the EU and NATO, with flat tax rates of 20% (Reagan would have loved that) and a bright future ahead of them. Their freedom, security and prosperity owes something to Ronald Wilson Reagan, as does our own.

Stated by: Janan Ganesh on June 6, 2004 2:04 PM

Two posts by an Iranian student at FreeRepublic:

1) "I'm an Iranian student living in Iran. I'd like to say my condolences over Mr. Reagan's death.

He was very beloved among us and people are sad to hear the news about his death.

Just wanted to post my sympathies and say that we also mourn and miss him."

Posted on 06/06/2004 4:56:23 AM PDT by Khashayar

2) "I don't want this post become political but let me clear one thing for our American friends here:

Regime hates you, not the people. Moreover they try to show their anger toward you to abuse and control us. They say "Death to America" to keep us cheated about their abuses, corruption, brutality and suppression of the people."

Posted on 06/06/2004 5:58:48 AM PDT by Khashayar

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1148462/posts

And from Jonah Goldberg:

"NATAN SHARANSKY, the former Soviet dissident, tells a great story about how he first learned of Ronald Reagan's famous (or infamous) "evil empire" speech. Writing in the Washington Post in 2000, Sharansky recalled:

"Nearly 20 years ago, confined to an 8-by-10 cell in a prison on the border of Siberia, I was granted by my Soviet jailers the 'privilege' of reading the latest copy of Pravda, the official mouthpiece of the Communist regime. Splashed across the front page was a condemnation of Ronald Reagan for having the temerity to call the Soviet Union an 'evil empire.'"

Sharansky and the other inmates didn't share Pravda's outrage. "Tapping on walls and talking through toilets, prisoners quickly spread the word of Reagan's 'provocation' throughout the prison. The dissidents were ecstatic. Finally, the leader of the free world had spoken the truth."

Whatever you may think of the "axis of evil" declaration in the president's State of the Union address, we can be sure that there are dissidents in Iran, Iraq and North Korea who feel the same way Natan Sharansky did nearly two decades ago."

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/jonah020602.asp


Stated by: Holly on June 6, 2004 2:17 PM

"I haven't spotted a single cynical comment about the D-Day commemorations"

Over on Channel 4, there were plenty of cynical comments being liberally spewed by revisionist German historian Jorg Friedrich.

Stated by: Holly on June 6, 2004 2:26 PM

You have to remember that, for the Mirror/Guardian/Independent/BBC/Channel 4 crowd (not to mention my country's CBC), the collapse of the USSR was a tragedy, not a triumph.

As I've said, they were on the wrong side of history when Reagan was President, and they're on the wrong side of history now. Screw 'em.

Stated by: Damian P. on June 6, 2004 3:36 PM

How was FDR a great President? He went into WWII for the wrong reasons (ie to bail out his failed welfare socialism), he abused the constitution in a myriad of ways and he create lots of bloated bureaucracies.

Lend-lease was a deplorable act that condemned Britain to going broke. The US should have been in the war from the get go and FDR was a moral coward in not getting them in sooner.

Reagan was far better a person, politician and a leader than FDR.

Stated by: Andrew Ian Dodge on June 6, 2004 5:01 PM

"Lend-lease was a deplorable act that condemned Britain to going broke"

Not so.

From the Britannica:

lend-lease:

system by which the United States aided its World War II allies with war materials, such as ammunition, tanks, airplanes, and trucks, and with food and other raw materials. President Franklin D. Roosevelt had committed the United States in June 1940 to materially aiding the opponents of fascism, but, under existing U.S. law, Great Britain had to pay for its growing arms purchases from theUnited States with cash. By the summer of 1940, the new British prime minister, Winston Churchill, was warning that his country could not pay cash for war materials much longer.

In order to remedy this situation, Roosevelt on Dec. 8, 1940, proposed the concept of lend-lease, and the U.S. Congress passed his Lend-Lease Act in March 1941. This legislation gave the president the authority to aid any nation whose defense he believed vital to the United States and to accept repayment “in kind or property,or any other direct or indirect benefit which the President deems satisfactory.” Though lend-lease had been authorized primarily in an effort to aid Great Britain, it was extended to China in April and to the Soviet Union in September. The principal recipients of aid were the British Commonwealth countries (about 63 percent) and the Soviet Union (about 22 percent), though by the end of the war more than 40 nations had received lend-lease help. Much of the aid, valued at $49,100,000,000, amounted to outright gifts. Some of the cost of the lend-lease program was offset by so-called reverse lend-lease, under which Allied nations gave U.S. troops stationed abroad about $8,000,000,000 worth of aid.

Stated by: Holly on June 6, 2004 5:18 PM

The interesting thing about Reagan is that he came into office insisting that the Soviet economy was poor and deteriorating, and that the system of Communism was unsustainable. At this time, leading academics strongly disagreed with this premise, including most economists of the Left (Lester Thurow's comments were particularly scathing). He proceded to order a military buildup on that assumption, although he added to this quite remarkable arms control agreements. (President Reagan's reasoning was that given that the US could outproduce the USSR, it merely had to threaten and show the willingness to do so, and the USSR would take peace and disarmament as a second option. Witness the Minutemen and SS-20 arms deal.)

After the fall of the USSR, Reagan's academic opponents, who previously had been steadfast in their insistance that the Soviet system was perfectly fine now insisted that it was always doomed to failure, and that Reagan was merely lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time. Even if that were so, he deserves credit for being one of the only ones to loudly and repeatedly predict its demise, and say that it was inevitable.

Either Reagan did a large part to bring about the end of the Soviet Union, in which case he deserves credit for that, or he was one of the only accurate visionaries when all the Sovietologists and academics were wrong, in which case he deserves credit for that, or some combination of the two.

Stated by: John Thacker on June 7, 2004 5:19 AM

Not all Sovietology was hopeless, although perhaps some practitioners might have felt it was pointless. The French historian Alain Besançon (See "Present Sovietique and Passe Russe" - a collection of essays written between 1976 and1981) - had devastatingly described the insubstantiality of the Soviet economy. But he was ignored by bien-pensant opinion and school text-books went on parrotting the old exploded Soviet-sourced statistics for the following ten years. Even his enemies described President Mitterrand as wily, brilliant cultivated etc, and yet he got the USSR completely wrong and was surprised (and not a little piqued) by the fall of the Berlin wall. Reagan, on the other hand, widely derided as a dumb film actor cow-boy got it right. How? Did he read Besançon and Pipes? Or was the truth about the Soviet Union, in some mysterious way, obvious?

(I'm not BTW claiming it was obvious to me. I was taught from those aforementioned text-books with their weirdly desolating pictures of grain silos 'owned not by rich individuals but by the people' . I think I, and my teachers, believed in some grim compromise between East and West whereby clothes, buildings, hairstyles and food would be uniformly ugly but there wouldn't actually be a prison camp on Amersham Hill. My friends, particularly when revising for exams, claimed to believe in inevitability of a nuclear holocaust. This sounded improbably exciting to me.)

Stated by: la marquise on June 7, 2004 11:41 AM

It's interesting to compare the left's current demonisation of GWB to the 1980's attacks on Reagan. Remember how Reagan could never be any good beacause he was a "Cowboy" and a "Filmstar"? Perhaps we can learn that the BBC/Grauniad/Independent just can't come to terms with the possibility that a right-wing politician might have some good ideas. Prejudiced? Oh no, not the BBC, never...

Stated by: Aron Landy on June 7, 2004 12:03 PM

"I think I, and my teachers, believed in some grim compromise between East and West whereby clothes, buildings, hairstyles and food would be uniformly ugly but there wouldn't actually be a prison camp on Amersham Hill."

There was such a compromise, of course. It was called The Seventies.

Stated by: Iain Murray on June 7, 2004 1:36 PM

A true word spoken in jest Mr Murray, you are pretty much right. Although I was 16 at the beginning of the eighties, the feeling was that the 70's would endlessly repeat themselves but with a growing austerity which would somehow be good for us. Reagan and Thatcher spared us this grim fate but their successors have not been able to prevent the return of flares .....

Stated by: la marquise on June 7, 2004 7:10 PM

Even now the sneering of the media doesn't stop.

I watched an edition of Channel 4 News yesterday with a female newscaster whose name I didn't catch moderating a discussion between Tony Benn and a representative, whose name I also didn't catch, from the Oxford Institute for American Studies or some such body.

Newscaster to man from OIAS - "Reagan was not a popular President, was he?"

Man from OIAS - "Well he won his first election by taking forty four states to Carter's six and got re-elected by winning forty nine states to Mondale's one. I don't quite know how you can be much more popular than that".

Newscaster - "But he was divisive President, wasn't he?".

Man from OIAS - "That is factually incorrect. When he left office he had the highest approval ratings of any President in history".

The newscaster did not even have the grace to look ashamed.

Just what is it with these people?

Stated by: Richard Buckley on June 7, 2004 9:21 PM

What a bizarre selection of posts. Impolite, it seems, to mention Reagan's fiscal profligacy (just how much debt did he rack up for future generations), his lying and suborning of Congress during Iran-Contra, his support for the murderers and rapists known as the Contras (remember the 1984 World Court judgement condemining him for the illegal blockading of Nicaraguan harbours?), the disgraceful social policy that saw destitution amongst the poor reach record levels, the bizarre fantasies (how many death camps did the old fraud liberate?), the kowtowing to red-baiters when President of the Screen Guild, that wonderful anti-drug policy known as, er, Just Say No, the brave and wholly purposeful invasion of Grenada, the cutting and running in Beirut in 83 (just as resolute as FDR, sure enough), et bleeding cetera . . .

All his death proves is that if you live long enough, any bunch of fools will scrape together a eulogy for you.

Stated by: lee on June 7, 2004 10:54 PM

Just to add a little more balance:

66 (Unflattering) Things About Ronald Reagan

By David Corn, The Nation
June 6, 2004

The firing of the air traffic controllers, winnable nuclear war, recallable nuclear missiles, trees that cause pollution, Elliott Abrams lying to Congress, ketchup as a vegetable, colluding with Guatemalan thugs, pardons for F.B.I. lawbreakers, voodoo economics, budget deficits, toasts to Ferdinand Marcos, public housing cutbacks, redbaiting the nuclear freeze movement, James Watt.

Getting cozy with Argentine fascist generals, tax credits for segregated schools, disinformation campaigns, "homeless by choice," Manuel Noriega, falling wages, the HUD scandal, air raids on Libya, "constructive engagement" with apartheid South Africa, United States Information Agency blacklists of liberal speakers, attacks on OSHA and workplace safety, the invasion of Grenada, assassination manuals, Nancy's astrologer.

Drug tests, lie detector tests, Fawn Hall, female appointees (8 percent), mining harbors, the S&L scandal, 239 dead U.S. troops in Beirut, Al Haig "in control," silence on AIDS, food-stamp reductions, Debategate, White House shredding, Jonas Savimbi, tax cuts for the rich, "mistakes were made."

Michael Deaver's conviction for influence peddling, Lyn Nofziger's conviction for influence peddling, Caspar Weinberger's five-count indictment, Ed Meese ("You don't have many suspects who are innocent of a crime"), Donald Regan (women don't "understand throw-weights"), education cuts, massacres in El Salvador.

"The bombing begins in five minutes," $640 Pentagon toilet seats, African-American judicial appointees (1.9 percent), Reader's Digest, C.I.A.-sponsored car-bombing in Lebanon (more than eighty civilians killed), 200 officials accused of wrongdoing, William Casey, Iran/contra. "Facts are stupid things," three-by-five cards, the MX missile, Bitburg, S.D.I., Robert Bork, naps, Teflon.

David Corn, Washington editor of the Nation, is author of 'The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception.'

Stated by: John T on June 8, 2004 4:58 PM

John T

Apart from the fact that some of these things were good, eg sacking striking air traffic controllers, a politician will always make mistakes / wrong judgments. Compared to saving the world from communism however, all of these things are small beer.

Also funny how the claim of Voodoo economics is thrown by leftists whose grasp of the dismal science is so shaky.

Stated by: Jonathan L on June 9, 2004 12:19 PM

Jonathan L,

"...some of these things were good...a politician will always make mistakes..."

Priceless. Perhaps you can point us towards all the other good things in the list above.

"...funny how the claim of Voodoo economics is thrown by leftists whose grasp of the dismal science is so shaky."

As anyone with an ounce of objectivity would recognise, most of what passes for mainstream economics is utter tosh. You might as well accuse some one of having a shaky grasp of alchemy or astrology.

Stated by: John T on June 9, 2004 2:32 PM

Such vomit inducing sycophancy towards a man who can only be described as a sick, terrorist supporting lune.
I think you'll find it difficult to find many "lefties" mourning the loss of the Soviet Union - and for that we have Gorby to thank.
However, many of us found it incomprehensible that the US should respond to the liberation of country from brutal dictatorship by backing para-military terrorists.
I'm sure it will be dry eyes all round for the relatives of the 50,000 Nicaraguans that were killed by the contras.

Stated by: alex on June 9, 2004 4:01 PM

John T - the only problem with blaming Reagan for the deficits of the 1980s is that it is not based on honesty.

Reagan, with what he actively did, caused more funds, numerically, to come into the US 'current account'. The Congress, with what *they* actively did, actually spent way more than was being brought in. Since the Congress was of the party opposed to Reagan, how does it become Reagan who is responsible for the deficits ?

If *your* spouse spends more money than you can earn, is that *your* fault, or the fault of your spouse for overspending ?

Or are you telling us he's responsible cuz he didn't bring in *enough* revenue ?

Of course, what I say is based on rational verifiable facts, not emotional response.

Similarly, the S&L scandal occurred because 4 prominent Senators on a sub-committee told investigators to STOP investigating and NOT to investigate until it was too late. Let's see - they were Cranston, Biden, Kennedy - can anyone remember the 4th ?

John T - now, which party were the 4 senators from ?

The "Silence on AIDS" meme is especially irritating. Reagan gave us Koop, probably the *best* Surgeon-General that the US has had in recent memory. AIDS wasn't even known until 1983, and Reagan was out of office less than 6 years later. In 1985, he was already earmarking significant funds for AIDS-related projects, and speaking about it officially, even before there could be mainstream scientific consensus. We are now some 15+ years past Reagan leaving office, and it's *still* all his fault ?

Consider the contrast with Shalala who, how many years later, when shown scientific studies supporting the effectiveness of needle-exchange programs in slowing the transmission of HIV, *still* did her best to prevent cities from instituting such programs.

And yet the meme continues - Reagan and Republicans evil, Democrats good ...

John T - by all means continue to be a victim of the Evil Ronnie if that's what your ego needs to be able to survive - the rest of us, like President Reagan, will get on with *doing* things rather than blaming others. We'll do good things; we'll make mistakes; and, overall, the planet, as with President Reagan will be a better place.

Stated by: Alasdair on June 14, 2004 11:53 PM
Stated by: bundlebox on July 13, 2006 5:11 PM

性交裸体图少女裸体女性裸体美女视频录像激情自拍录像三级片免费成人电影免费黄色电影免费激情电影免费色情电影免费性交电影免费性爱电影三级片美女视频录像人体艺术图辑黄色网站色情色情网站成人网站三级片三级片三级片三级片三级片三级片黄色网站激情小电影激情小电影艺术激情享受激情小电影日本强奸电影郎裸体图库林心如拍黄的图片性生活片电影在线性感丝袜美女图片玉蒲团之玉女心经十八淫书色兔妹妹图片全球十大禁片bt下载性交裸体图亚洲成人淫民网妹妹厕所走光图片视频聊天成人电影黄色电影激情电影色情电影性交电影性爱电影日本av电影情色电影同志电影下载激情视频下载明星露点图片写真电影阴部图片乳房图片明星裸照性爱视频偷拍图片台湾成人视频聊天网美女做爱图 美女裸体图片美女美穴清晰大图性感美女视频性爱处女的图片 图女人成人手淫免
免费电影网免费在线电影看免费电影免费电影网站最新韩国电影两性生活性教育片免费电影神话最新电影无极免费激情电影免费黄色电影最新电影下载成人性爱电影美女图片美女走光美腿图片三级片强奸电影美女祼体图片黄色电影下载免费色情电影性感美女图片漂亮妹妹图片做爱图片美少女幼女图片舒淇写真集舒淇全裸照偷窥电影偷窥小说偷窥图片美女被强歼小说巨乳小电影免费下载美女厕所偷窥视频mm自拍艳舞仙人洞美女一个馒头引发的血案神雕侠侣少妇美女 美女图明星露点写真裸体写真 明星裸体写真人体艺术写真美臀女人图片 性感美女图片女性乳房 女性乳房写真女人屁股 女性屁股 偷拍三级片性感美女床上自拍三级片免费成人电影免费黄色电影免费色情电影免费成人电影免费色情电影免费黄色电影免费成人电影免费黄色电影免费黄色电影免费色情电影免费色情电影偷拍女人的图片18 贴 图 台湾 成人男同性恋写真图片午夜天堂成人小说-午夜天堂成人电影台湾网络小说 台湾网络电影小龙女与尹志平图片性闻美女洗澡小游戏 美女洗澡偷拍电影艳舞成人图库女明星图片丁字裤免费电影在线看免费电视连续剧收看美臀 翘臀 图片少妇展穴 色影无忌 床第间的正点自拍露点图片女性最易献身时刻自拍DV偷拍录象美女诱惑写真自拍短片人体艺术另类成人小说黄色网站成人论坛成人图片走光三级片视频录像激情视频18dy-脱轨电影,tuogui性感美女床上自拍色情影音-激情写真media情色激动电影-18dy 18dy-激动电影免费小电影性电影免费成人电影下载免费电影在线观看宽带电影经典电影下载免费恐怖电影免费影片下载免费影院最新大片十八电影网美女写真人体艺术人体写真美国大片免费成人影片在线看电影成人网站乳房 图 奸淫极品嫩穴图片美女插穴黄色小说在线激情电影性教育电影两性电影看电影的网站免费看电影免费在线电影免费电影下载

Stated by: 三级片 on July 16, 2006 2:09 PM
Post a comment

    


    •