November 04
2003
How's tricks, Mr Galloway?
» Posted on November 4, 2003 04:46 PM » Category: Iraq

From the Washington Post:

BAGHDAD, Nov. 2 -- The CIA has seized an extensive cache of files from the former Iraqi Intelligence Service that is spurring U.S. investigations of weapons procurement networks and agents of influence who took money from the government of Saddam Hussein, according to U.S. officials familiar with the records.

...They contain not only the names of nearly every Iraqi intelligence officer, but also the names of their paid foreign agents, written agent reports, evaluations of agent credentials, and documentary evidence of payments made to buy influence in the Arab world and elsewhere, the officials said.

...The recipients of the Iraqi funds were described by U.S. officials not as formal intelligence agents, but as prominent personalities and political figures who accepted money from Iraq as they defended Hussein publicly or pressed his causes.

So, George, how's the case against the Telegraph coming along?


MessageSpace
Comments

"George Galloway, the MP expelled from the Labour Party, for his vehement opposition to the Iraq war, has been offered £96,000 in libel damages over claims that he was in the pay of Saddam Hussein."

...though by the Christian Science Monitor rather than the Telegraph. More at http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=460556

Stated by: Phil Rodgers on November 5, 2003 1:50 PM

That's simply because they're 2 different sets of documents. From CSM's June 20, 2002 article:

"On April 22, London's Daily Telegraph reported that papers retrieved by their correspondent David Blair from the ruins of Iraq's Foreign Ministry described alleged government payoffs to Mr. Galloway, a Labour Party MP and longtime critic of the West's hardline toward Mr. Hussein. The Daily Telegraph report received widespread attention in the European press and throughout the world.

On April 25, the Monitor ran its own piece about papers detailing Galloway's alleged ties to Baghdad. The documents were purported to have originated in the Special Security Section, run by Saddam's second son, Qusay.

However, the Monitor's documents were different in many details from those of the Daily Telegraph, and came from a different source. Monitor contract reporter Philip Smucker obtained them from an Iraqi general, who in turn said he had captured them after his men shot their way into a home once used by Qusay Hussein."

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0620/p01s03-woiq.html

Stated by: Franco Alemán on November 5, 2003 4:50 PM
Stated by: Franek on June 6, 2006 7:07 AM
Stated by: bundlebox on July 12, 2006 11:26 AM
Post a comment

    


    •